In recent years, there has been a trend towards start-up incubation. Building and taking to market a novel startup is fraught with challenges. Successful and unsuccessful entrepreneurs alike have likely confronted many issues that newly minted entrepreneurs are faced with every day.
A lot of seasoned entrepreneurs are now giving back to the community by mentoring the greenies through various program formats. Because this is a new category, it defies categorization, but I’ll give it a shot anyway.
1) accelerators
There are a number of small groups of perhaps two or three entrepreneurs that will provide their mentorship services for a fee or equity. They are typically boutique organizations with varying degrees of competitiveness and have limited availability to provide direction and guidance with largely unstructured programs. One example is colorjar, led by Jeff Hoffman of Priceline fame
2) incubators
Incubators provide startups with a class-like program, either full-time and intensive, or part-time. Some will work with your existing concept but more often than note, they will encourage you to evaluate whether or not you have the right idea, segmentation, etc. Techstars and Y Combinator are two more established intensive incubators. The founder institute is a more recent entry with a part-time curriculum in 9 cities.
3) camps
There are also a number of part-time accelerator like programs that take place over a shorter period of time. These can provide good networking opportunities and potential link building.
My experience?
Incubators
Techstars
I applied to techstars and attended their techstars for a day in Boulder. There were roughly 150 entrepreneurs and high caliber presenters including David Cohen who founded the program, Seth Levin of the Foundry group and a number of mentors who had successfully founded tech companies including past participants in the program. I did not get in to the program, as accepts almost exclusively companies that have more than one founder and has an acceptance rate that is more competitive than Harvard.
The Founder institute
I did get in to the Founder Institute. But didn’t make it past the first session. I found the curriculum to be thoughtful and probably very useful if I were at the ideation phase. But the program would have encouraged me to completely re-assess Smedule and given that I’m pretty vested, that’s not the approach I’d want to take. So, buh buy FI
accelerators
Colorjar
This is a newer entrant that positions itself as getting involved only in ideas that they fall in love with. They are more entertainment-oriented as evident by their website. I got a referral from someone in tech who I deeply respect, so I thought I would see where I went with this. Had a couple meetings including a pitch to Jeff Hoffman, which I thought went well. He said my idea was a good one and went on to say:
There are three barriers to building a viable product and bringing it to market:
1) the idea isn’t a good one
2) the cost to get it to market will exceed the value prop
3) there is a low return on the value prop
Interesting I thought. At least I have the first one down. I suspect that colorjar anticipates that there will be a high cost in getting Smedule to market which is evident from the fact that I didn’t hear from them for months after that initial conversation. And I’m inclined to agree. This business to business to consumer model is not an easy nut to crack. But crack I will!
Generally speaking I think these programs could be very useful under these conditions:
– your concept is very early stage
– you have a technical resource/co-founder who can get stuff done and maintain the business while you, the business person, run the business
– you have lots of free time
– you need money
– you don’t have much experience in new product development and business development